- About
- Deep Parsing
- Syntactic Complexity
- Cues for Text-To-Speech
- Question Generation
- Sanskrit parsing
- Contact
- Privacy Policy
2.35
bhayAdraNNAduparataM m ... [8.3.23] mo'nusvAraHa
tvAM m ... [8.3.23] mo'nusvAraHa
yeSHAM ch ... [8.3.23] mo'nusvAraHa
tvaM b ... [8.3.23] mo'nusvAraHa
bahumato bh ... [6.1.114, 6.1.87, 1.3.2, 8.2.66] hashi cha
bhayAdraNNAduparatam ... [6.1.72] saNhitAyAm
bhayAdraNNAduparatam ... [8.2.39] jhalAm jasho'nte
Underlying: bhayAt raNNAt uparatam mansyante tvAm mahArathAs , yeSHAm cha tvam bahumatas bhUtvA yAsyasi lAghavam .
COMMENTS:
- The gerund 'bhUtvA: having been' shown in clause A.2 highlights an issue that arises when gerunds are shown as independent clauses (as the parser does). In this stanza, the gerund has no direct object. [MM2015] and other commentators treat this gerund term as an indeclinable adjunct of the passive past participle 'NOM-S:bahumataHa: [one who is] highly esteemed'. This treatment results in the reading 'you [who] having been highly esteemed of whom will become disrespected'. However, the internal syntactic structure of this interpretation is unclear given the unambiguous Case of several terms involved (i.e. 'NOM-S:tvam:you' and 'NOM-S:bahumataHa:[one who is] highly esteemed').
A: bhayAt raNNAt uparatam mansyante tvAm mahArathAHa yeSHAm cha tvam bahumataHa bhUtvA yAsyasi lAghavamA.1:
bhayAt:ABL-S:bhaya:Neut.:Noun raNNAt:ABL-S:raNNa:Neut.:Noun uparatam:ACC-S:uparata:Masc.:Adj:past_participle_passive_kta_1A_upa-ram:Link_subj_tvAm mansyante:III-P:man:4:A:VerbFutureSimple tvAm:ACC-S:yuSHmad:Masc.:Pronoun mahArathAHa:NOM-P:mahAratha:Masc.:Noun A.2:
bhUtvA:-:bhU:1:P:VerbGerund A.3:
yeSHAm:GEN-P:yad:Masc.:Pronoun cha:Indeclinable tvam:NOM-S:yuSHmad:Masc.:Pronoun bahumataHa:NOM-S:bahumata:Masc.:Adj:past_participle_passive_kta_4A_man:Link_subj_tvam yAsyasi:II-S:yA:2:P:VerbFutureSimple lAghavam:ACC-S:lAghava:Neut.:Noun